TAX DISPUTE ANALYSIS ON MARKET INTELLIGENCE SERVICE’S FROM OUTSIDE OF CUSTOMS

Penulis

  • Hilda Octavana Siregar Gadjah Mada Unievrsity
  • Agus Suharsono Badan Diklat Kementerian Keuangan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32897/jsikap.v5i1.372

Kata Kunci:

Tax, Law

Abstrak

Services from outside the customs are services performed to produce goods due to orders or requests with materials and upon instructions from customers from outside the Customs Area. This study discusses the treatment of market information services in the Tax Court Decision No. PUT-072196.16 / 2007 / PP / M. VB of 2018 for the correction of VAT of Rp23. 046,544,386.00. The dispute in this decision is the existence of payment to an overseas company for the receipt of market intelligence services received by companies in Indonesia which, according to the Appellant, are not objects of VAT because they are only reimbursed. The method is qualitative normative using one case. The existing case is connected with the existing law and then the writer draws a conclusion on the decision. The result of this paper is that the judge has made a decision that he still maintains a correction of Rp23,046,544,386.00 and in accordance with the existing Law without ignoring the facts in court that the transaction is a VAT object.

Referensi

Aizenman, J., Jinjarak, Y., Kim, J., & Park, D. (2019). Tax Revenue Trends in Latin America and Asia: A Comparative Analysis. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(2), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1527686

Aritonang, J. (2018). Analisis Sengketa Pajak Atas Biaya Seragam (Studi Kasus Atas Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Nomor 1710/B/Pk/Pjk/2016). Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara, 1(1), 497–519.

Armando, Tupa Andri dan Rosdiana, H. (2019). Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Pajak atas Penyerahan Casing & Tubing High Grade. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 5(3), 399–410.

Brotodiharjo, R. . (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. In Yogyakarta;Teras) (Keempat). PT. Refika Aditama.

Diantha, I. M. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Prenada Media grup.

Djatmiko, H. (2016). H, Djatmiko (2016). Problematika sengketa pajak dalam mekanisme peradilan pajak di Indonesia. Biro Hukum dan Humas, Badan Urusan Administrasi, Mahkamah Agung, Republik Indonesia.

Gale, W. (2020). Raising Revenue with a Progressive Value-Added Tax. Tacking the Tax Code: Efficient and Equitable Ways to Raise Revenue, 99197, 191–236.

Ibrahim, J. (2012). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Banyu Media.

Indonesia, P. (2020). n o t a K e u a n g a n. Nota Keuangan Beserta Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja Negara Tahun 2020, Defisit dan Pembiayaan Anggaran, 224–339. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/media/14041/nota-keuangan-beserta-apbn-ta-2020.pdf

Iskandar, P., & Junadi, Y. (2011). Memahami hukum di Indonesia : sebuah korelasi antara politik, filsafat, dan globalisasi. IMR Press.

Kohli, Ajay K., and B. J. J. (1990). Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.

Kotler, Philip, and K. L. K. (2012). Marketing Management (14th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Mariti, P., & Smiley, R. H. (1983). Co-Operative Agreements and the Organization of Industry Author ( s ): P . Mariti and R . H . Smiley Source : The Journal of Industrial Economics , Vol . 31 , No . 4 ( Jun ., 1983 ), pp . 437-451 Published by : Wiley OF INDUSTRY *. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 31(4), 437–451. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2098340 .

Mertokusumo, S. (2007). Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar (Liberty (ed.)).

Nsubuga Mayanja, S., Mahazi, K., & Daniel, T. (2020). Effect of Tax Dispute Resolution Mechanism on Taxpayer’s Compliance: <i>The Case of Rwanda</i> Science Journal of Business and Management, 8(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20200802.14

OECD. (2020). Consumption Tax Trends 2020 VAT/GST and Excise Rates, Trends and Policy Issues. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/152def2d-en

Panggabean, H. P. (2014). Penerapan Teori Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia. Alumni.

Puttman, W. . (2009). Legal Analysis and Writing. Delmar Cengage Learning.

Riyanto. (2013). Keterampilan Hukum, Panduan untuk Mahasiswa, Akademisi dan Praktisi. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Soekanto, S. (2015). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. UI Pres.

Stake, R. E. (2008). Qualitative Case Studies. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, 119–149.

Sultony, A., & Ustadztama, M. G. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Penyebab Kekalahan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak dalam Sidang Banding Sengketa PPh Badan Ditinjau Dari Alat Bukti Dan Dasar Peraturan Perundang-. BPPK.

Sutrisno, D. (2016). Hakikat Sengketa Pajak Karakteristik Pengadilan Pajak Fungsi Pengadilan Pajak. Kencana.

Tahmasebifard, H. (2018). The role of competitive intelligence and its sub-types on achieving market performance. Cogent Business and Management, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1540073

Tampubolon, K. (2013). Praktek, Gugatan, dan Kasus-Kasus Pemeriksaan Pajak. Indeks.

Tepper, P. R. (2008). Basic Legal Writing for Paralegals (Second Edi). The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Diterbitkan

2021-02-08

Terbitan

Bagian

Artikel

Cara Mengutip

TAX DISPUTE ANALYSIS ON MARKET INTELLIGENCE SERVICE’S FROM OUTSIDE OF CUSTOMS. (2021). Jurnal SIKAP (Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing Dan Perpajakan), 5(1), 90-103. https://doi.org/10.32897/jsikap.v5i1.372